Striking Durham high school teachers gain support from CUPE Ontario

Apr 25, 2015 | 

Striking Durham high school teachers gain support from CUPE Ontario

CUPE Ontario donates $5,000 to teachers’ union in Oshawa

DurhamRegion.com

DURHAM — The Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario joined striking Durham teachers on the picket line at Eastdale Collegiate in Oshawa Friday to show their support.

During a barbecue held April 24 at noon, CUPE Ontario donated $5,000 to District 13 of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation.

About 1,900 Durham District School Board public high school teachers have been on strike since April 20, putting 21,000 students out of the classroom.

Sid Ryan, president of the Ontario Federation of Labour, 50 members of CUPE Ontario, members of the Durham Region Labour Council, and MPP Jennifer French showed up to support the teachers on strike.

“We’re here to show solidarity with the teachers,” said Fred Hahn, president of CUPE Ontario, in an interview. “What’s happening here is related to our members.”

CUPE Ontario represents support workers for schools, including custodial workers, early childhood educators and secretarial staff.

Mr. Hahn says the provincial government needs to remove all concessions on the bargaining table and “get serious” with negotiations.

Mr. Ryan said in an interview he believes the issues stem from budget cuts leading to increased class sizes and loss of quality classroom education. He says corporate tax cuts from 14 per cent to 11.5 per cent are one of the reasons provincial education budget cuts are happening. He says raising the corporate tax back to 14 per cent would help prevent budget cuts.

“We’ve got a revenue problem, not a budget problem,” said Mr. Ryan.

He also says the negotiations are part of the issue and the school board needs to stop “playing games.

“In the bigger picture it’s about austerity,” says Mr. Ryan.

Ms. French also says the negotiations need to be taken more seriously.

“You’re hearing a lot of dictated terms instead of negotiations,” she says.

In an April 22 statement, the DDSB says it is willing to negotiate.

“No local job action, such as this strike, was needed to keep the DDSB at the table — we were there, we did not leave, and we remain committed to finding a settlement,” the statement notes.

Currently there is no word on when local contract talks will start up again. Provincial level talks are continuing at the “central table” where issues such as wages and class sizes are being discussed.

— With files from Jillian Follert

Sudbury teachers join Durham’s on strike

Sudbury teachers join Durham’s on strike

Teachers at the Rainbow District School Board in Sudbury will hit the picket lines Monday. Durham teachers have been off the job for a week now.

Durham Region high school teachers hit the picket lines on Monday, April 20, affecting some 24,000 students. They'll be joined by their colleagues in Sudbury as of Monday, April 27.

ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE / TORONTO STAR Order this photo

Durham Region high school teachers hit the picket lines on Monday, April 20, affecting some 24,000 students. They’ll be joined by their colleagues in Sudbury as of Monday, April 27.

Sudbury-area high school teachers will hit the picket lines Monday as a strike in Durham Region heads into its second week.

Rainbow District School Board Chair Doreen Dewar said the Sudbury-area board “came to the table ready to negotiate and responded to all union proposals. The union chose not to respond and advised (that)they did not see any possibility of progress,” said. “In fact, the union suggested the time would be better spent preparing for the strike.”

Sudbury’s union local — District 3 of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation — put out a news release Saturday blaming the strike and the talks’ failure on management’s “refusal to engage in real negotiations.”

James Clyke, president of District 3, had said Friday that while he did not wish to discuss specifics, he said the main issue at the table is the working conditions of teachers, “which have been under pressure for quite some time now, with ministry and school board initiatives that are constantly being piled on.

“When you start eroding those working conditions, the learning conditions for students are also affected.”

This round of contract talks is two-tiered, with the provincial school boards’ associations, unions and the Ministry of Education trying to settle costly issues likeclass size, salary and sick leave. Individual school boards and union locals are negotiating non-monetary items.

Dewar, whose board covers Sudbury, Espanola and Manitoulin, said she’s hopeful a local deal can be reached but called it “a difficult process” for all involved.

Locally, issues that could be dealt with include grievance procedures or unpaid leaves, and “we cannot (discuss) anything that has to do with monetary issues — that has to be done provincially,” she said.

“I’m getting the feeling that we won’t be able to sign off on anything until the provincial bargaining is done.”

A strike by District 3 teachers will affect some 5,000 students at the board’s 10 high schools.

The OSSTF has named five other boards it will target for local strikes — Peel, Halton, Waterloo, Ottawa and Lakehead/Thunder Bay — with Peel teachers heading off the job May 4 if no deal is reached.

On Friday, District 19 president Mike Bettiol said talks held last Thursday with the help of Ministry of Labour mediators “were extensive but very little was resolved.”

The two sides return to the bargaining table April 30 and May 1.

The OSSTF has said once on strike, teachers will remain off the job until a collective agreement is reached.

Michael Barrett, president of the Ontario Public School Boards’ Association, said the messaging around a possible Sudbury strike sounds the same as it did before Durham teachers hit the picket lines, “and to me is part of a larger strategy to apply pressure at the provincial table in order to come towards a deal.”

Barrett, who is also chair of the Durham District School Board, said he’s hearing from students and parents about the strike.

“There (were) no talks scheduled this weekend, no talks scheduled for Monday. The strike is entering its second week and, tragically, we are no further ahead than we were last Monday.

“Students are still outside the classroom (in Durham) and on Monday we will have many more thousands of students who are out of the classroom” in the Sudbury area.

Meanwhile, the province’s Catholic teachers have voted 94.2 per cent in favour of strike, and the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario has received a no-board report, putting its members across the province in a legal strike position as of May 10.

“By voting ‘yes,’ you have demonstrated the strength of your commitment to your profession, to your colleagues, and the long-term well-being of your students,” said James Ryan, president of the Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association, in a written release about the strike vote results.

“Your vote tells your provincial bargaining team that you support them as they go head to head with an employer group that seems determined, not only to freeze your compensation, but also turn back the clock on the gains made over decades of negotiations.”

Ontario Catholic teachers vote to strike

BY , TORONTO SUN

FIRST POSTED: SATURDAY, APRIL 25, 2015 05:08 PM EDT

empty school desks and chairs (650x366) 7 ways
(Fotolia)

TORONTO – Stundents in Ontario’s Catholic schools could be out of class as early as May 10 now that their teachers have voted to strike.

The Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association announced it’s members voted 94.2% in favour of strike action late Friday.

The vote puts them in a position to join their Durham Region public high school counterparts after they hit the picket lines last Monday.

“OECTA members have clearly expressed their opinion of the trustees’ and the government’s position at the bargaining table with this strike vote,” said union president James Ryan. “Our teachers know that what has been proposed goes far beyond demands for a wage freeze. The employer side is using the economy as the excuse to take back everything OECTA has gained in bargaining, locally and provincially, for decades. This includes provisions that recognize teachers’ professional judgment and fair hiring practices.”

The Catholic teachers’ union says its 50,000 members, who teach all grades in English Catholic schools across the province, aren’t heading towards a strike for a salary increase, but for improved working conditions.

They say the province is trying to strip them of their professional autonomy.

“Our members know they must take a stand against such proposals that also threaten students’ learning conditions,” says Ryan.

The Ontario Catholic School Trustees’ Association said it is committed to finding a resolution to avoid a strike.

“Our focus is always on the wellbeing of all students and staff and our efforts remain focused on achieving a negotiated settlement that supports their well-being. We will continue to bargain in good faith, respecting the negotiating process and maintaining the specifics of negotiations at the table,” said Kathy Burtnik, president of OCSTA.

Trustee Maria Rizzo with the Toronto District Catholic School Board says she sees the union’s actions as a vote of solidarity.

“If you haven’t had a pay increase in a few years you might be prone to this as well,” Rizzo said.

“We don’t negotiate with unions. We’re out of the picture. They (the province) have taken over negotiations and it makes it difficult for everyone. (School boards) should be dealing with our own unions.”

OSSTF Back The Barganing Table

The National Post is reporting that the minister of education states that central (provincial) table negotiations between OSSTF and the government resumed this morning.  (I think they mean between OSSTF and OPSBA, but the article says between OSSTF and the government.)

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/central-negotiations-resume-as-high-school-teachers-in-one-ontario-board-walked-off-the-job-monday

Paul O’Donnell
Senior Research Officer
Canadian Union of Public Employees
1375 St. Laurent
Ottawa, Ontario K1G 0Z7
Tel: (613) 237-1590 X 227
Fax: (613) 237-5508
podonnell@cupe.ca

Durham teachers strike could unleash wave of labour unrest; Six more school boards targeted as unions grow increasingly frustrated at bargaining table

Durham teachers strike could unleash wave of labour unrest; Six more school boards targeted as unions grow increasingly frustrated at bargaining table
Toronto Star
Mon Apr 20 2015
Byline: Kristin Rushowy Toronto Star

Durham public high school teachers will hit the picket lines on Monday in a protest widely seen as the start of a wave of teacher unrest across the province, with six more boards targeted in the coming weeks and other unions growing increasingly frustrated at the bargaining table.

“There’s an intensity of emotions with regard to the issues . . . and there’s a definite philosophical divide that could very well prolong this action,” said Michael Barrett, president of the Ontario Public School Boards’ Association and chair of the Durham District School Board. “I’m not sure at this point, based upon the conversations that have been going on at the provincial table,” whether a deal can be soon reached, he said. “When there’s no light at the tunnel, it’s tough to see out of the darkness.”

On the weekend, the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation formally ended all talks at the provincial level, and had previously accused the government and school boards’ association of not bargaining seriously, seeking “strips” or clawbacks to previously won gains. Those include bigger class sizes, more out-of-class supervision time, as well as a demand for an unpaid day off and a slower movement up the salary grid.

But in the past, the school boards were vocal about their opposition to a number of rules imposed on them during the last round of bargaining, including a regulation that forces principals to hire long-term supply teachers based on seniority rather than fitness for the job, as well as allowing teachers to decide which diagnostic tests to use on students, arguing there would be no consistency from year to year.

Earlier last month, the Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association, which is holding strike votes this week, opposed any clawback, saying it was a blow to teacher professionalism.

For the first time, the province, school board associations and teacher unions are bargaining under new legislation where costly items such as salaries and benefits are settled at the provincial table, while school boards and union districts negotiate local deals on items specific to each.

The new system was supposed to help avoid labour chaos, after the 2012-13 school year that saw teacher walkouts and work-to-rule campaigns to protest a contract being imposed on teachers.

While some bargaining did eventually take place, neither unions nor the school boards were happy with the process.

Although the complexity of the new system can be blamed for some of the delay, teachers have been without a contract since last August and the union is now putting pressure on the provincial talks with local strike action, which could hit Peel, Halton, Sudbury, Thunder Bay, Ottawa and Waterloo in short order.

Other insiders say that despite the government being seen as education friendly, no one should rule out broader job action come this fall, involving all teacher unions, should provincial talks continue at such a slow pace.

The government has been clear there’s no money for salary increases unless teachers give up something to cover the cost.

“Our government remains committed to a respectful bargaining process that is in line with our fiscal plan and continues to support student achievement,” Education Minister Liz Sandals said in a statement Sunday, adding it was “disappointing that local talks between OSSTF and the Durham District School Board have broken down.”

Students in Durham also weighed in on the weekend, appealing to all three sides to come to a resolution as soon as possible to avoid a strike.

“Believe it or not, we want to stay in school. We want to keep learning, earning those credits and we want to graduate,” says a letter that student leaders at Pickering’s Pine Ridge Secondary School sent to the school board, the OSSTF, Premier Kathleen Wynne and Sandals.

Cameron Penn, a Grade 12 student leader bound for the University of Ottawa in the fall, is concerned, like many of his peers, that a strike could require time lost to be made up in the summer, possibly resulting in the loss of summer jobs.

“Another thing is all our students worked very hard to plan numerous events for our school, which could be cancelled,” he says. “All these events that students worked on, for our community and for charities, could be cancelled and that would be a tragedy.” Penn, 17, says historically, labour disputes have left students feeling ignored and used for leverage. “We believe the whole point is to educate the students, and the fact that no one was asking us how we felt, we sort of felt left behind,” he says. “We know that you care about the students, so it’s time to show it,” says the letter. “There are no reasons which justify the interruption of our education.”

But Barrett said the last decade of contract negotiations has been difficult, and that the last time around, when some conditions were imposed on teachers and boards, “nobody was happy … there were certain frameworks in that agreement that were not acceptable to the school boards. Certainly, we’re looking for adjustments to some of those elements we were never quite happy about.”

And while he agreed the new system is complex, he acknowledged that a recent pay increase for Toronto police – which raised eyebrows among many teachers who expressed their displeasure on social media – has not helped matters.

The four-year police contract, overwhelmingly ratified by members of the Toronto Police Association last week, includes a cumulative pay increase of 8.64 per cent.
“It’s very, very difficult to take the premise of fiscal responsibility and then expect it to be at the hands of a few … (the police raise) was a very difficult premise to swallow and I understand the angst.”

Paul Axelrod, a professor in the faculty of education at York University, agreed.

“The imposition of salary freezes by the province, and the apparent desire to remove class size ceilings in a time when the government appears to have spent irresponsibly on e-health, ORNGE, and the power plants – these issues have not been forgotten despite the last election – means that employees in the public sector, like teachers, are not likely to be passive in current and upcoming negotiations,” he said.

“Clearly, the large provincial deficit hovers over all of this, but government is still spending in selected areas. The sector is asking why education shouldn’t be one of these priorities.

“I think it will be tough going in the coming months.”

With files from Tamara Khandaker

(c) 2015 Torstar Corporation

Ontario moves to fast-track process to close ‘underutilized’ schools

Ontario moves to fast-track process to close ‘underutilized’ schools

The Globe and Mail

Mon Apr 6 2015

Byline: KAREN HOWLETT

The Ontario government is speeding up the process for closing schools, as part of a crackdown on publicly funded boards with too many classrooms sitting empty.

Several boards are grappling with declining enrolment across Ontario, where about 600 schools, or one in eight, are less than half full, according to the Education Ministry. School boards spend $1-billion a year, 5 per cent of their provincial operating budgets, on buildings with an excess of empty space. They are coming under renewed pressure to address the financial drain, with Education Minister Liz Sandals saying the money should be used instead for student programs.

Her ministry defines schools less than two-thirds full as “underutilized” – candidates for closing or changes to their boundaries or programs they offer. The ministry unveiled new guidelines 10 days ago for community consultations that must take place before a school can be closed. But critics say the guidelines limit public engagement and make it easier to close schools.

A committee reviewing the fate of a school is required to hold two public meetings instead of four under the new regime, and the time frame for conducting a review is cut to five months from seven. Another major change causing considerable angst for municipal officials is a shift in emphasis toward student achievement and away from considering the impact of closing a school on a community and local economy.

Doug Reycraft, chair of the Community Schools Alliance, a not-for-profit that strives to work with the ministry, municipalities and boards, said holding only two open meetings over a shorter time period leads one to conclude that public input is not important.

“These changes are really just a recipe for an avalanche of closures across the province,” Mr. Reycraft said.

“To take the existing process and make it tighter is just an affront to democracy.”

Monika Turner, director of policy at the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, said focusing the review process more narrowly on the interests of students might help school boards solve their fiscal challenges. But it comes, she said, at the expense of the longer-term interests of a community, including the impact closing a school could have on residential real estate values.

“A school is the hub of a community,” Ms. Turner said.

“When you close a school, that community has lost a draw for anybody to ever come back.”

The new process gives municipal governments a formal role for the first time, providing an opportunity for school boards to collaborate with municipalities in making the best use of school space.

“Ultimately, we actually want the school boards and the municipalities to have an ongoing relationship where [they] are sharing their planning data so that the municipalities are aware of where there are clusters of underutilized schools,” Ms. Sandals said in a recent interview.

Earlier this year, she forced the Toronto District School Board to come up with a plan to reduce its underutilized space, which does not include classrooms used for adult education, English as a second language or community programs.

One in five schools at the board falls within the threshold. Trustees agreed in February to conduct community reviews on a total of 68 schools over the next three years.

Under the new guidelines, the review committee acts as a conduit for sharing information between school-board trustees and the community. However, the power to close a school rests solely with the board of trustees. Committee members do not get to vote on whether to close a school.

Michael Barrett, president of the Ontario Public School Boards’ Association, said in many heavily contested cases in the past, it was often a municipality that was fighting to prevent a school from closing.

“Everybody wants the school to remain open,” he said.

“But nobody wants to pay for it.”

© 2015 The Globe and Mail Inc. All Rights Reserved.